How a mammogram may help identify heart disease

Nancy Preston didn't have a heart attack. Nor did she have chest discomfort, shortness of breath or heart palpitations — all symptoms of heart disease. Instead, a routine mammogram led to Preston having quintuple bypass surgery last summer.

"It was just something horrible waiting to happen," said the 67-year-old from New York City. "I did not have symptoms, except for feeling a little more fatigued than usual, which I attributed to age."

Preston does have a family history of heart disease. Her mother had a heart attack and a double bypass, and an older sister had a heart attack and has a pacemaker.

Even so,heart diseasewasn't top of mind for Preston, a yoga enthusiast whoexercised dailyand followed a healthy diet. Herhigh blood pressureandType 2 diabetes— two conditions that can increase a person's odds of developing heart disease — had been under control before her health scare, she said.

In October 2024, Preston got her annual mammogram at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. Doctors detected breast arterial calcifications, or BAC, on Preston's mammogram.

Nancy Preston holds a document while seated (Courtesy Nancy Preston)

What are breast arterial calcifications?

Breast arterial calcifications are calcium buildups within the breast arteries that may be associated with heart disease. Mount Sinai isconducting a behavioral studyto understand how women react to being notified about the arterial calcifications with their mammogram results.

After Preston, who is participating in the study, was notified of her breast arterial calcification, she underwent a cardiac stress test, which monitors the heart during physical exertion.

"In [Preston's] case, her heart function was very strong at rest, but during the stress portion, part of her heart muscle was not squeezing appropriately," said Dr. Mary Ann McLaughlin, a cardiologist at Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital. "Her results indicated multivessel coronary artery disease."

McLaughlin and Preston believe the BAC findings saved her life.

A black and white mammogram showing breast calcification (Mt. Sinai)

"The only reason that Nancy went ahead with a stress test was because she was a participant in the study," McLaughlin said. "If she had come to me with what she had, which was well-controlled risk factors and no symptoms, I likely would not have referred her for the stress test."

Preston continues to recover from the major surgery she had in July. "Thank God this BAC was shared with me," she said.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends women ages 40 through 74 get a mammogram every other year to screen for breast cancer. While federal law mandates that certain information, such asbreast density, be included in mammography reports, providers don't have to mention breast arterial calcifications.

Dr. Laurie Margolies, chief of breast imaging at the Dubin Breast Center at Mount Sinai and a leader of the study, hopes to change that.

"In over 10% of mammograms, you will see calcified arteries, and people are always surprised," said Margolies, who has been studying the relationship betweenbreast arterial calcification and heart diseasefor about a decade. "When the arteries are calcified in a woman's breast, it only makes logical sense that vessels might be calcified elsewhere."

Breast arterial calcifications, which are specific to breast arteries, are different from the calcifications common to other areas of the breast. Macrocalcifications, which appear as white dots on a mammogram, are typically benign, according to the National Cancer Institute. Microcalcifications appear as white specks and may indicate cancer in some cases. About half of women develop benign breast calcifications.

The Mount Sinai study, which began recruiting patients 40 and older in 2021, aims to analyze BAC rates in a diverse sample of 14,875 women. Margolies estimates 12.5% of women in the health system have breast arterial calcifications, including those with known heart conditions.

The second part of the study randomly splits 1,888 patients with breast arterial calcifications into two groups. Women in the first group are notified of their results, educated about heart disease risk and encouraged to consult a preventive cardiologist. Women in the second group receive a standard mammography letter, then are notified of their BAC readings six months later.

Results are expected in early 2027.

How breast screening helps detect heart disease

A 2018 review published in theJournal of Cardiovascular Imagingadvocated for mammography as a screening tool for heart disease. A 2022 study published in the journalCirculation: Cardiovascular Imagingfound an association between breast arterial calcification and heart disease inpostmenopausal womenages 60 to 79, while 2024 research published in the journalJACC: Advancesnoted that BAC was "especially predictive" of heart disease in younger women ages 40 to 59.

Dr. Naomi Ko, section chief of breast medical oncology at NYU Langone Health, said the Mount Sinai study adds to a growing body of evidence that cardiovascular disease clues lie in the breasts.

In some cases, women may be able to improve their heart health through behavioral and medication changes to stave off more serious medical intervention.

"Give me an opportunity to counsel my patients toward better lifestyle choices, and I'll take it," said Ko, who isn't involved in the research. "If it triggers and influences improved health behaviors and engagement positively in your health care, awesome."

The budding link between breast arterial calcification, also called vascular calcification, and heart disease is just that.

"It's not a slam dunk," Ko said. More research is needed, and women shouldn't panic if they learn they have BAC.

"We know these calcifications are associated with cardiovascular challenges, but we're not 100% certain about what that could mean for every single individual patient," Ko said. "This is one data point about your body."

Mammogram findings should prompt discussions about both a patient's heart and breast health, said Dr. Melanie Chellman, a Cleveland Clinic breast radiologist who isn't involved in the study.

"The great thing about mammograms is that we're already doing them on the particular women who are at the highest risk for heart disease: ages 40 and older," Chellman said. "We can use those same pictures to look for calcifications that are vascular."

Dr. Steven Isakoff, co-clinical director of breast oncology at the Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, said educating health care providers is as big a hurdle as informing patients.

"Most of my colleagues, I would bet, are not aware of the association between breast arterial calcifications [and heart disease]," said Isakoff, who wasn't involved in the study. "Without more specific guidance in the report about what steps to take, I would think it might not get acted upon."

More research is needed to define how much arterial calcification in the breast may be cause for concern, he said. Meanwhile, he praised Mount Sinai's efforts to fill in gaps in the data.

"There's a lot of information buried in mammograms," Isakoff said.

How a mammogram may help identify heart disease

Nancy Preston didn't have a heart attack. Nor did she have chest discomfort, shortness of breath or heart palpitation...
A protestor speaking in a small group in support of Trump carries gun on her belt during the Women's March Phoenix Rally outside of the Arizona State Capitol on January 19, 2020. - Nicole Neri/The Republic/Imagn

A US appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state was unconstitutional.

A panel of the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appealssided, opens new tab2-1 with a gun owner in ruling that the state's prohibition against open carry in counties with more than 200,000 people violated the US Constitution's Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

About 95% of the population in California, which has had some of the nation's strictest gun-control laws, live in counties of that size.

US Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, who was appointed by Republican President Donald Trump, said the Democratic-led state's law could not stand under the US Supreme Court's 2022landmark gun rights ruling.

That decision, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v Bruen, was issued by the court's 6-3 conservative super majority and established a new legal test for firearms restrictions. The test said they must be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."

VanDyke, whose opinion on Friday was joined by another Trump appointee, said the latest case "unquestionably involves a historical practice — open carry — that predates ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791."

He noted that more than 30 states generally allow open carry. California itself allowed citizens to carry handguns openly and holstered for self-defense without penalty until 2012, he said.

"The historical record makes unmistakably plain that open carry is part of this Nation's history and tradition," VanDyke said.

The ruling partially reversed a 2023 decision by a lower-court judge who had rejected a 2019 challenge to the law by gun owner Mark Baird.

While the appeals court largely sided with Baird, it rejected his related challenge to California's licensing requirements in counties with fewer than 200,000 residents, which may issue open-carry permits.

Senior US Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith, who was appointed by Republican former President George W. Bush, dissented, saying his colleagues "got this case half right" as all of California's restrictions complied with the Supreme Court's ruling.

A spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat who defended the state's ban, in a statement said his office is considering its options. "We are committed to defending California's common sense gun laws," the spokesperson said.

The 2022 Supreme Court ruling has prompted court cases nationwide challenging modern firearm restrictions, including in California.

A 9th Circuit panel in September 2024 upheld a California law that prohibits people with concealed-carry permits from carrying firearms at several categories of "sensitive places" like bars, parks, zoos, stadiums and museums.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

California ban on openly carrying guns is unconstitutional, court rules

A US appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state was unconstitutional. ...
Trial to begin for police officer charged in delayed response to Uvalde school shooting

Families who lost loved ones in the 2022 attack onan elementary schoolin Uvalde, Texas, have sought for nearly four yearsto hold accountablethe police who waited more than an hour to confront the shooter while children and teachers lay dead or wounded in classrooms.

Now one of the first officers on the scene is about tostand trialon multiple charges of child abandonment and endangerment. Former Uvalde schools police officer Adrian Gonzales is accused of ignoring his training in a crisis with deadly consequences. His attorney insists he was focused on helping children escape from the building.

The trial that starts Monday offers potentially one of the last chances to see police answer for the long delay. The families have pinned their hopes on the jury after their gun-control efforts were rejected by lawmakers, and their lawsuits remain unresolved. A few parents ran for political office to seek change, with mixed results.

The proceedings will provide a rare example of an officer being criminally charged with not doing more to stop a crime and protect lives.

Jesse Rizo's niece was one of 19 children and two teachers killed by the teenage gunman in one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history. Nine-year-old Jackie Cazares still had a pulse when rescuers finally reached her, Rizo said.

"It really bothers us a lot that maybe she could have lived," he said.

Only two of the 376 officersfrom local, state and federal agencies on the scene have been charged — a fact that haunts Velma Lisa Duran, whose sister, Irma Garcia, was one of the teachers gunned down.

"What about the other 374?" Duran asked through tears. "They all waited and allowed children and teachers to die."

The charges reflect the dead and wounded children, but not her sister's death or that of the other teacher who was killed.

"Where is the justice in that?" Duran asked. "Did she not exist?"

Prosecutors will likely face a high bar to win a conviction. Juries are often reluctant to convict law enforcement officers for inaction, as seen after theParkland, Florida, school massacre in 2018.

Sheriff's deputy Scot Peterson was charged with failing to confront the shooter in that attack. It was the first such prosecution in the U.S. for an on-campus shooting, and Peterson wasacquittedby a jury in 2023.

The attack, the delay and the indictments

Police and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott initially said swift law enforcement action killed Uvalde gunman Salvador Ramos and saved lives. But that version quickly unraveled as families describedbegging police to go into the buildingand 911 calls emerged from students pleading for help.

The reality was that 77 minutes passed from the time officers first arrived until a tactical team breached the classroom and killed Ramos.

Multiple reportsfrom state and federal officials cataloged cascading problems in law enforcement training, communication, leadership and technology, and they questioned whether officers prioritized their own lives over those of the children and teachers.

Gonzales was charged two years later in an indictment that alleged he placed children in "imminent danger" of injury or death by failing to engage, distract or delay the gunman and by not following his active shooter training.

The indictment said he did not advance toward the gunfire despite hearing shots and being told where the shooter was.

The only other officer to be charged is formerUvalde schools Police Chief Pete Arredondo. His trial on similar charges has not yet been set.

Uvalde County District Attorney Christina Mitchell did not respond to requests from The Associated Press for comment on the indictments or whether a grand jury considered charging other officers.

According to a report by state lawmakers, Gonzales was among the first officers in the building. They heard gunfire and retreated without firing a shot after Ramos shot at them.

Gonzales told investigators he later helped break windows to remove students from other classrooms.

"He was focused on getting children out of that building," said Gonzales' attorney, Nico LaHood, a former district attorney and prosecutor in San Antonio. "He knows where his heart was and what he tried to do for those children."

The trial was moved from Uvalde to Corpus Christi, 200 miles away, after defense attorneys and prosecutors agreed a change of venue would be the best way to find an impartial jury.

A divided community

In Uvalde, a city of about 15,000 people, the Robb Elementary building is still standing, but it's empty. A memorial of 21 white crosses and flowers sits in front of the school sign. Another memorial is displayed at a downtown water fountain plaza. Murals of the victims cover walls on buildings around town.

Craig Garnett, owner and publisher of theUvalde Leader-Newsnewspaper, said people who were not directly affected by the attack "have found it pretty easy to move forward."

Garnett also believes getting the trial out of Uvalde was a good move for the city.

"The community was terribly divided in the aftermath," he said. If the trial were held there, "you would have so many opportunities to inflame things."

Some victims' parents sought political office but with little success.

Javier Cazares, Jackie's father, ran unsuccessfully in 2022 for the Uvalde County Commission as a write-in candidate on a platform that called for more rigorous police training. Kimberly Mata-Rubio, whose daughter Lexi was killed, made a bid for mayor in her memory in 2023 but lost.

Rizo, who won a seat on the school board in 2024, agreed that many Uvalde residents have moved on from May 24, 2022. He finds that maddening.

"I hear, 'They tried the best they could' and 'Do you blame them? Would you have taken a bullet?'" Rizo said. "It angers me and frustrates me."

Uvalde has a strong tradition of supporting law enforcement. Two of the people killed came from law enforcement families.

Mata-Rubio's husband was a sheriff's deputy who went to the school after the attack started. The other teacher killed, Eva Mireles, was married to one of the first officers to enter the building.

Families pursued multiple paths for justice

The families have sought justice through multiple legal paths.Federaland state lawsuits have been filedagainst law enforcement, a gun manufacturer, avideo gamecompany and theMeta social media companyover the shooting. Those cases are still pending.

The families reached a $2 million settlement with the city that promised higher standards and better training for police.

Relatives also lobbied state and federal lawmakers for stricter gun control laws that never advanced. But earlier this year, Texas lawmakers passed the Uvalde Strong Act, which sets new requirements for active shooter training and shooting response plans for police and schools.

Duran wants accountability not just for her sister but also for a beloved brother-in-law who died two days after the shooting.

Irma's husband, Joe, was watching a television report on the shooting when he heard that authorities missed their chance to end the attack quickly. He immediately fell to the floorwith an apparent heart attack, Duran said.

The conviction of a single officer out of almost 400 would bring little in the way of justice, Duran said.

"The only justice is going to be when they take their final breath," she said. "And then God will judge them."

Trial to begin for police officer charged in delayed response to Uvalde school shooting

Families who lost loved ones in the 2022 attack onan elementary schoolin Uvalde, Texas, have sought for nearly four years...
'Somewhere to put worker bees': Why Canada's micro-condos are losing their appeal

Maggie Hildebrand's first apartment in Toronto had a kitchen, a dining table, a workspace and a bed – all in the same 300-sq-ft room.

It was a decent home at first, close enough to her job downtown and with all the bare necessities for daily living.

But it didn't take long for the 28-year-old to feel boxed-in. "It was so isolating in that tiny space," she told the BBC. "It definitely feels like it's just somewhere to put worker bees during the night."

Ms Hildebrand lived in one of the city's micro-condos, a once rare sight in Canadian real estate that has become ubiquitous in the last decade thanks to fast-growing, high-rise developments in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver.

But - as Canada's condominium market sinks to lows not seen in decades due to a series of market pressures - the value of these micro units is cratering faster than any others.

The condo market is experiencing a downturn not seen since the 1980s, with thousands of move-in-ready units sitting empty and unsold across Toronto and its surrounding regions. Over the last year, an unprecedented 18 condo projects were cancelled in the city, with experts expecting that number will grow as demand continues to plummet.

The downturn has reignited debate over whether developers catered too much to real estate investors by building smaller, more affordable units that minimised square footage to keep prices low in areas where land values are high, and which were often designed to be rented out or flipped for profit.

Investors own the majority of condos under 600 sq ft in Toronto, according to national database Statistics Canada. Construction of these small units skyrocketed in 2016, and they now make up 38% of condos built in the city, compared with only 7.7% before.

These units have not exploded in the same way in the US, where they represent a very small share of the market, though Nadia Evangelou, a senior economist at the National Association of Realtors, said "their prevalence has roughly doubled over the past decade".

With so much inventory on the market in Canada, some micro-condos that had sold for half a million dollars a few years ago are now reselling for C$300,000 ($217,000; £163,000) or less – a price recently unthinkable in downtown Toronto, which is often cited as one of the most unaffordable cities in the world.

"It's a race to the bottom getting these things sold," said Shaun Hildebrand, president of Urbanation, an organisation that has been tracking the high-rise market in Toronto for decades. (Shaun Hildebrand is not related to Ms Hildebrand.)

Why are so many condos sitting empty?

The condo slump is not unique to Toronto, with Vancouver experiencing a similar –albeit smaller – downturn since 2024.

There are a few reasons for this, experts tell the BBC.

First is an overabundant supply. Thousands of units were built over the last two years, in part to meet an unprecedented surge in Canada's population driven largely by immigration, Mr Hildebrand said.

But the number of newcomers dropped sharply following a shift in Canada's immigration policies, made partly to address the housing crunch. Areport released in December by the Bank of Montrealshows that Canada's population saw its largest decline in 2025 on record since the 1940s, barring the 2020 Covid pandemic, driven mainly by new immigration caps.

It is a turn-around that developers could not have predicted, and resulted in more than 60,000 new units completed in recent years to meet a demand that no longer exists.

Simply put, "the market just got way too ahead of itself", Mr Hildebrand said.

The second reason is pricing.

Canada's central bank lowered interest rates during the pandemic to stimulate the economy, and investors, looking to buy in a real estate market that had seemed like a sure bet for decades, assumed prices could only continue to rise.

For a while they did, spiking "to a level that really made no sense", Mr Hildebrand said.

Then, the Bank of Canada began to increase rates to battle post-pandemic inflation. Combined with oversupply, that sure bet became less certain.

Now, some investors are having trouble closing on units they bought pre-construction at those inflated prices. Many have been forced to try and sell them at a significant loss. Others are too spooked to enter the market or are waiting for prices to drop even further, Mr Hildebrand said.

There is some speculation thatCanada's 2022 freeze on foreign home buyers, brought in to help tackle the housing affordability crisis, also played a role. Numbers show that they represent a small fraction of owners – around 2% to 6% – but Mr Hildebrand said it is possible it has sent a signal that Canada is closed for business.

The condo crash and the housing market

One clear winner from the downturn of the condo market is renters like Ms Hildebrand, who now have more options due to greater supply and slightly better deals on rent.

Ms Hildebrand paid C$2,200 a month for her micro-condo. She has since moved to a larger, 700 square-foot, one-bedroom apartment in an older building with a leafy backyard for only C$200 more. She credits the move to a big improvement in her quality of life.

"My birthday is tomorrow, and I'm having a party and hosting 25 people," she told the BBC in December. "A year ago, that was not possible."

Mr Hildebrand said the slump will likely change who developers see as their main customer, shifting from short-term investors seeking quick profits towards longer-term investors and people who plan to settle in the condo they're buying,

"We've learned our lesson here," he said. The units won't be phased out altogether, he noted, because there is still demand for affordability, "but we went way too far".

Some buyers are benefiting, too. Alex Cruz, a Toronto-based estate agent at Ari Zadegan Group Realty, told the BBC that smaller units were being purchased by those looking for a bargain.

"If there is a good deal per square foot, people will buy it," Mr Cruz said, adding it had given some "an opportunity to get into the market".

The slump comes as Canada grapples with a housing crisis that has become a central political issue for all levels of government. Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised to double the rate of new homes built in the next decade.

With the construction of thousands of units now put on hold or cancelled, there will be fewer units entering the market by the end of the decade. This could exacerbate Canada's housing crunch, Mr Hildebrand said, as condos are heavily relied on to boost supply in big cities.

And Mr Hildebrand and others warn that the low prices will be short-lived.

"The question now is how long do we stay here, and what are the implications going to be for the housing supply in the next decade?" Mr Hildebrand said.

'Somewhere to put worker bees': Why Canada's micro-condos are losing their appeal

Maggie Hildebrand's first apartment in Toronto had a kitchen, a dining table, a workspace and a bed – all in the same...

Picture of fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela's largest military complex, after a series of explosions in Caracas on January 3, 2026. Credit - Luis Jaimes— AFP via Getty Images

President Donald Trump said Saturday the United States captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro after carrying out a "large-scale" strikeagainst the country.

In a post on Truth Social, TrumpsaidMaduro had been "captured and flown out of the Country" and said the operation "was done in conjunction with U.S. Law Enforcement."

Trump's comments came hours after explosions were reported across Venezuela in the early hours of Saturday morning, following months of threats from President TrumpagainstMaduro.

Several explosions were reported by witnesses in the capital, Caracas, beginning around 2 am local time. Videos posted to social media showed large explosions and what appeared to be U.S. military aircraft flying low over the city.

The Venezuelan government said attacks also occurred in the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira. Photographs showed parts of Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela's largest military complex, engulfed in flames.

Read more:Trump Advisors and Venezuela Opposition Leaders Plan for Maduro's Departure

President Donald Trump reportedly ordered the strikes inside Venezuela days ago, according to CBS News, after months of threats to expand a U.S. bombing campaign against alleged drug boats to targets inside the country.

Trump has repeatedly called Maduro an illegitimate president and accused him of being responsible for smuggling drugs into the United States. He said in aninterviewlast month that Maduro's "days are numbered."

President Maduro declared a state of emergency in response to the attacks, according to a statement from the Venezuelan communications ministry. The statement said the government "rejects, repudiates, and denounces" U.S. military aggression.

At least 115 people have been killed since September in the U.S. strikes against alleged boats that the Trump Administration claims are smuggling drugs. Analysts andlegal experts have questionedthe legality of the boat strikes, which have been carried out without congressional approval.

The Trump Administration has been building up military forces in the region for months while ratcheting up threats against Venezuela's government. The Pentagon deployed 10 F-35s to Puerto Rico. The U.S.S. Gerald Ford, thought to be the largest and most advanced aircraft carrier in the world, recently joined eight warships and some 10,000 troops already in the region.

Trump also authorized the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct covert operations in Venezuela. Maduro responded directly to the revelation, calling the move a "desperate" attempt at regime change.

A Pentagon spokesperson referred TIME's questions to the White House. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Contact usatletters@time.com.

Trump Says U.S. Has Captured Venezuela's President Maduro

Picture of fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela's largest military complex, after a series of explosions in Caracas on January 3, 2026. Cred...
Ireland's Micheál Martin will visit China in the first trip by an Irish leader in 14 years

BEIJING (AP) — Ireland'sPrime Minister Micheál Martinwill visit China from Sunday and meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the first visit by an Irish leader in 14 years, the Chinese Foreign Ministry announced Saturday.

Beijing has been strengthening ties with individual members of the European Union despite tensions with the EU bloc overtariffsand human rights issues. In late 2025,French President Emmanuel MacronandSpanish King Felipe VImet with Xi in separate trips to China.

During his five-day trip, Martin will also meet with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, who had invited him, and Zhao Leji, chairperson of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the ministry said in a statement. Besides Beijing, he will travel to Shanghai, it added.

Through the visit, the ministry said, China is ready to work with Ireland to expand cooperation and foster China-EU relations.

In December, China imposed up to 42.7% of provisionaltariffs on dairy productsincluding milk and cheese imported from the EU. China had initiated other probes into European brandy and pork imports as countermeasures for the EU's tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.

Beginning Sunday, China will separately host South Korean President Lee Jae Myung for four days. During his stay, he will meet with Xi, theirsecond meetingin just two months.

Lee's trip came at a time of rising Sino-Japan tensions, after Japanese Prime MinisterSanae Takaichiin November said that her country's militarycould get involvedif China were to take action against Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its sovereign territory.

Last week, China conductedlarge-scale military drillsaround the island for two days to warn against what it called separatist and "external interference" forces.

Ahead of his trip, Lee said that South Korea consistently respects the "One China" policy when it comes to Taiwan during an interview with China's state broadcaster CCTV.

Ireland's Micheál Martin will visit China in the first trip by an Irish leader in 14 years

BEIJING (AP) — Ireland'sPrime Minister Micheál Martinwill visit China from Sunday and meet with Chinese President Xi ...
Judge dismisses Louisville police reform proposal with the US Department of Justice

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — A federal judge in Kentucky has dismissed Louisville's proposed settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice over police reforms after the department withdrew its support of the plan earlier this year.

The Justice Departmentannounced in Mayit was canceling proposed consent decrees with Louisville and Minneapolis that sought to curb police racial bias and abuses after the killings ofGeorge FloydandBreonna Taylorthat spurred nationwide protests in the summer of 2020.

U.S. District Judge Benjamin Beaton wrote in a Dec. 31 ruling that "the responsibility to lead the Louisville Metro Police Department in compliance with federal law must remain with the city's elected representatives and the people they serve."

A judge in May dismissed Minneapolis' proposed consent decree, which places a federal officer in charge of tracking the progress of reforms laid out in the agreement.

Justice Department officials under President Joe Biden's administration conducted a multiyear investigation in Louisville prompted by the fatal shooting of Taylor and police responses to public protests in 2020. A draft of the investigation was released in early 2023, alleging the Louisville Police Department "discriminates against Black people in its enforcement activities," uses excessive force and conducts searches based on invalid warrants.

New DOJ leadership accused the Biden Justice Department of using flawed legal theories to judge police departments and pursuing costly and burdensome consent decrees.

The consent decrees with Louisville and Minneapolis were approved by the Justice Department in the final weeks of the Biden administration, but the settlements had to be approved by a judge.

Beaton wrote that his ruling "doesn't prevent the parties from undertaking the hard work of reform themselves."

The city has initiated some reforms since Taylor's death in March 2020, including a city law banning the use of "no-knock" warrants. The warrants were typically used in surprise drug raids. The city also started a pilot program that sends behavioral health professionals to some 911 calls.

The city also paid a $12 million wrongful death settlement to Taylor's family.

Earlier this year, former Louisville Police Detective Brett Hankison became the first officer involved in the Taylor raid to go to prison. Ajudge sentenced Hankisonto nearly three years in prison on an excessive force conviction despite the Justice Department's efforts to reduce his sentence to one day of time served.

Hankison shot 10 rounds after police were fired on by Taylor's boyfriend from inside her apartment. Hankison shot blindly into Taylor's windows but didn't strike anyone inside or in a neighboring apartment.

Judge dismisses Louisville police reform proposal with the US Department of Justice

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — A federal judge in Kentucky has dismissed Louisville's proposed settlement with the U.S. Depar...

 

CR GLOW © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com